Skip to content

fix ipykernel #799 by removing publish_status in process_control - #819

Closed
mizililo wants to merge 1 commit into
ipython:anyiofrom
mizililo:master
Closed

fix ipykernel #799 by removing publish_status in process_control #819
mizililo wants to merge 1 commit into
ipython:anyiofrom
mizililo:master

Conversation

@mizililo

@mizililo mizililo commented Dec 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

because control_channel shouldn't publish execution_state

@JohanMabille

JohanMabille commented Dec 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think we should wait before merging this. I have opened a JEP to move the kernel_info_request to the control channel to fix jupyterlab/jupyterlab#10174, and the jupyter server expects both a reply to the kernel_info_reply and a message on IOPub to cosider it has connected to the kernel. Merging this PR would break the new behavior.

Notice there is a on-going JEP to replace PUB socket with XPUB socket, so that clients get an iopub message upon connection and they don't have to nudge the kernel anymore.

@mizililo

mizililo commented Dec 7, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

OK

@Carreau

Carreau commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think according to the JEPwe can close this; plus it's been 5 years, feel free to start with a new PR if this is in correct.

@Carreau Carreau closed this Aug 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants